Sunday, March 22, 2015

Obama wants voting to be mandatory!

Another Pitbull attack!!!

Oh no! Another attack by a pit bull!

Oh no! Another attack by a pit bull!

Isis fanatics 'fear being killed by a woman will deprive them of virgins in paradise'

Isis fanatics 'fear being killed by a woman will deprive them of virgins in paradise'

Women fighters joining ranks of Kurdish peshmerga forces hold particular power over male extremists promised 72 virgins if they die in battle





























KURDISTAN...Iraqi Kurdish woman militia fighter Shams Mahmoud, aims with her gun during an exercise on Saturday, Nov. 2, 2002 in Peshmerga forces center in Sulaymanyah city which is controlled by   the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan (PUK). (AP Photo/Hasan Sarbakhshian) Isil fanatics 'fear being killed by a woman will deprive them of virgins in paradise'
Women have long been a feature of Kurdish peshmerga forces.  Photo: AP
Violent jihadis know their reward will come in heaven, in the shape of 72 virgins - but not apparently if they are killed by women.

The increasing number of female soldiers taking to the front line against extremists of the Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant (Isil) is sowing fear in their ranks that they will be denied their prize in paradise, according to Ed Royce, who chairs the US House International Relations Committee.

"These Isil soldiers apparently believed that if they were killed in battle, they went to paradise as long as they were killed by a man," he told The New York Post, citing reporters of Kurdish female fighters laughing as they repelled attacks by the extremist group.

"And these female soldiers were communicating their satisfaction with the fact that they had taken the fight to ISIL and had stopped the advance, turned back the advance - slayed a number of these fighters, who would then run away.

Koranic verses or poetry promising 72 virgins in paradise to jihadists who die in battle have been used frequently by radical imams and extremist groups as a recruitment tool.
However, it seems that male fighters are unclear about whether dying at the hand of a woman comes with the expected reward.

Women have long been a feature of Kurdish peshmerga forces. Now many from threatened towns and villages are signing up to join all-women units to fend off Isil forces who are threatening to overrun their homeland.

"We are being trained to use snipers, Kalashnikovs, rocket propelled grenades and hand grenades," a woman from the minority Yazidi community told The Telegraph earlier this month in the Sinjar mountain range.

Isil forces have overrun large areas of Iraq and control significant territory in neighbouring Iraq, imposing their harsh version of Islamic law. For women that means tough restrictions, such as bans on visiting markets or leaving the house without a headscarf.

They certainly are not allowed to fight.

Tekoshin, a 27-year-old female Kurdish soldier, fighting in northern Iraq recently told AFP she had joined the struggle to protect women's rights.

She said many women knew the power they held over their opposition.

"I think [they] were more afraid of us than of the men," she said.
"They believe they'll go to hell if they die at a woman's hands."

What Is Killing the Restaurants of Seattle?


What Is Killing the Restaurants of Seattle?

Fury after school recites pledge in Arabic

One nation under allah: Fury after school recites pledge in Arabic


Now Playing
Parents outraged after NY school recites pledge in Arabic

Students at Pine Bush High School in Pine Bush, New York, knew right away there was something not quite right about the Pledge of Allegiance. That’s because the pledge was being recited in Arabic.

“One nation under Allah,” the student body president announced over the intercom system on Wednesday.

Reaction in the upstate New York high school was swift, and so was the backlash, The Times Herald-Record reports. Furious students tried to shout down the recitation in their classrooms. Other students sat down in protest.

School Superintendent Joan Carbone told the newspaper that the Arabic pledge “divided the school in half” – noting that many complaints came from Jewish parents and those who had lost family members fighting the war on terror.

The outrage among students was so significant that the school issued an apology.

“We sincerely apologize for having the Pledge of Allegiance recited this morning in the high school in a language other than English,” the apology read. “In our school district the Pledge of Allegiance will only be recited in English as recommended by the Commissioner of Education.”

Well, that’s somewhat reassuring.

However, state regulations do not mandate that the pledge be recited in a specific language. It recommends only specific wording.

108.5 Pledge to the flag.
(a) It is recommended that schools use the following pledge to the flag:
“I pledge allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America and to the Republic for which it stands, one Nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.”
(b) In giving the pledge to the flag, the procedure is to render the pledge by standing with the right hand over the heart.

The school said the pledge was recited in Arabic as a way to honor National Foreign Language Week “and in an effort to celebrate the many races, cultures and religions that make up this great country.” It said the pledge had been recited in other languages throughout the week.

That explanation didn’t set well with student Alex Krug.

“I think it should be said in English,” he told television station TWCNews.com. “It is foreign language week but we don’t even offer Arabic in Pine Bush High School.”
Andrew Zink, the student body president, defended what he did and said he would do it all over again – telling TWC News he “knew exactly what would happen” because “it’s the right thing to do.”

Zink wrote on his Twitter account: “To everyone who disagrees with my decisions, I respect your right to do so and hope we can have a productive conversation,”

Oh, there’s been no shortage of conversation around the small town.

“Thanks to the illegal invasion and the concept of ‘celebrate diversity,’ English is becoming a foreign language in America,” one critic wrote on the local newspaper’s website.

A writer who claimed to be an American of Arab Christian ancestry said he, too, was offended by what happened.

“The Pledge of Allegiance isn’t a ‘salute’ to America,” he wrote. “It’s a promise to be loyal to it. Part of that loyalty should be to learn English and integrating into our culture.”

Based on the comments made by the student body president, it appears the Arabic recitation was less about celebrating a foreign language and more about stirring up trouble.

Lucy Coffey, 108, oldest female veteran, dies in San Antonio

Lucy Coffey, 108, oldest female veteran, dies in San Antonio

Ve2t1.jpg 
 
The nation’s oldest woman veteran has died. She was 108.

Lucy Coffey was found dead in her bed in San Antonio Thursday morning. Her friend, Queta Marquez of the Bexar County Veterans Service Office said Coffey had been sick for about a week and had a chronic cough.

“It is with great sadness we learned that our beloved Ms. Lucy Coffey, our nation's oldest female veteran who served in WWII, passed away,” Marquez said in a Facebook post. “She was an incredible lady who will be missed dearly. Her contributions to our country and community will never be forgotten.”

The Indiana-born farm girl was working at a Dallas A&P supermarket on the day Japan attacked Pearl Harbor. The San Antonio Express-News reports she quit her job in 1943 and joined the Women’s Army Auxiliary Corps.

During her service she was stationed around the Pacific and earned two Bronx stars. She continued to serve her country after the war as an Army civilian on Okinawa.

“When Vice President Biden and I had the honor of meeting Sgt. Coffey at the White House last year, she was America’s olding living woman veteran, and it was clear that the passage of time never dampened her patriotic love of country or her pioneering spirit,” President Obama said in a statement Friday.

The Express said Coffey met Biden and Obama as part of a final visit she wanted to make to Washington. A group in Austin organized her all-expenses-paid honor flight. In Washington she visited the World War II memorial, Arlington Cemetery and the Women’s Memorial.

“I’d like to go to see things that are there that were not there before,” she told the paper, explaining why she wanted to go. “It’s been a long time since I’ve in in Washington, but I would like to go to see the things that are there.”

Funeral arrangements were incomplete. There were plans to hold a memorial service in San Antonio.

The Express said only one other vet was older than Coffey, Richard Overton of Texas was born three days before her in May 1906.

Coffey suffered a stroke in 2013. She was confined to a wheelchair and needed oxygen to breathe.

** Rest easy Ms Coffey, Your work is done. We in America, salute you for your service. **

Some people make a boatload of money with Racism!





U.S. Muslim Brotherhood Front Groups Condemn Suggestion That Islamists be Barred from United States

U.S. Muslim Brotherhood Front Groups Condemn Suggestion That Islamists be Barred from United States

Gov.-Louis.-Bobby-Jindal

“In the west, I believe we have a responsibility,” Jindal told the American Action Forum, a conservative think tank, “to insist that those coming into our societies, those who come to our country, assimilate or integrate.”
IB Times: “What he is doing is fearmongering,” said Haris Tarin, the director of the Washington office of the Muslim Public Affairs Council. “This is another one of those issues where he is using fear to garner votes and the latest in a line of remarks he has made over the past few months to try to seem relevant for the 2016 elections.”

Jindal is attempting to exploit a “common fear of Muslims” in the U.S. with an eye toward the elections, said Corey Saylor of the designated terrorist group CAIR (Council on American-Islamic Relations). “It’s an unfortunate reality that some politicians will pick on minorities rather than offer solutions to the economic and real national security issues our country faces.”

As the 2016 election campaign begins to ramp up, Muslims in America fear Jindal, a Christian convert who was born a Hindu, will not be alone in attacking Islam to score points. (Hopefully) “We have seen this happen in every election cycle since 2006,” said Tarin. “Muslim issues have become the new gay issues and abortion issues. You can’t get away with using the gay community for political football anymore but you can still do it with Muslims, unfortunately.” (Maybe that’s because gays aren’t killing people, but Muslims are.)

Jindal has also made a point of publicly countering the Obama administration on foreign policy issues and recently accused the president of not being honest about the threat posed by radical Islamic terrorists. “It’s time for our president to have the fortitude to tell the American people the truth about radical Islam and put his political base aside so we can defeat these terrorists,” he wrote in a Feb. 23 editorial for Fox News.

The Guardian: Jindal said the US should not permit entry to people who would “use the freedoms we give them to undermine the freedoms we grant to everyone.” Jindal said he would “draw the line” with a test of intention. “You have the right to have whatever beliefs you want, you don’t have the right to impose those beliefs in a way that infringes on the freedoms of other people.”

Jindal used ISIS as his primary example but also said the first Muslim Brotherhood (CAIR‘s parent organization) includes “ideologies that are hostile to our interests.” ‘If we don’t insist on assimilation, we then go the way of Europe” (allowing mass Muslim immigration, which will create Islamic republics there).

“So in other words, we shouldn’t tolerate those who want to come and try to impose some variant of, some version of, Sharia law,” Jindal said. “I fear if we don’t insist on assimilation,” he said, “we then go the way of Europe.” European cities, he said warily and without specified examples, included neighborhoods in which women felt afraid to walk without veils.

Jindal said it was “nonsense” that such remarks, which follow comments made in London about Muslim “no-go zones,” might be perceived as “racist or anti-Muslim.” He refused, however, to backtrack from any such comments, saying, “Islam has a problem.”

In London, Jindal made similar remarks, saying, “it is completely reasonable for nations to discriminate between allowing people into their country who want to embrace their culture, or allowing people into their country who want to destroy their culture or establish a separate culture within.”

“Of course we’re not at war with Islam,” (Actually we ARE) Jindal said in Washington, “but of course we are at war with radical Islam and radical Islamist terrorists.”
Source
Walid Shoebat is a former member of the Muslim Brotherhood who was converted to Christianity, and author of the book, God’s War on Terror.
Courtesy of Freedom Outpost.

An open letter to General Quantock


 Dear Sir,

You are in a unique position in the government of The Republic of the united States of America.

You may be one of the few people qualified by your job title to arrest a President of The United States.

Why?

Because, the Constitution for the Republic of the united States of America considers that a President is also The Commander in Chief of the Armed Forces of this Nation.

He is therefore subject to the UCMJ, The Universal Code of Military Justice, just like the lowliest Private Soldier.

So, even a Usurper, or Felony Impersonator occupying the Office of The President, and therefore, criminally impersonating the Commander-in-Chief, it would be the duty of the Provost Marshal General to arrest such a person and bring him before the Judge Advocate General (JAG) for trial by Court Martial while he is impersonating the C i C.

You probably have heard of the various “Scandals” our current President, (C i C) is, “involved” in, as the Bought and Paid for Main Stream Media calls it.

Having Congress call him a co-conspirator, or, “Involved” during the Impeachment of Eric Holder for gun running to the Mexican Cartels.

The very fact that Holder was found guilty by the House, which affects the Impeachment, but not punished by the Senate, in any way, belies what fools we have for Members of Congress.

That is another story, however. Benghazi. What a rat’s nest! The impersonated Commander-in-Chief ordered General Ham to “Stand down”, and not let any help come through to the beleaguered Ambassador to Libya and 3 of his staff. All 4 were murdered by a gang of savages called an Islamic Jihad.

Even though 2 former Navy SEALs disobeyed orders and got killed while freeing 30 of the Ambassador’s staff, they killed a number of the enemy.

Always expecting re-enforcements at any moment, those retired Navy SEALs fought to the death defending America! The NSA “Snooping” “Scandal”.

The implications get worse every day. The Obamacare “Scandal”…

The President himself, had to admit that his pet project had to have its implementation to businesses with 50 or more employees, postponed until sometime in 2014 because it was such a “Train Wreck”—the usurper of the Presidency’s own words!—in paperwork for the companies it was being imposed on.

The IRS “Scandal”. Hiring 20,000 new IRS agents to be armed with .40 Cal. Hollow-point bullet semi-automatic pistols to enforce the use of Obamacare on businesses with over 50 employees.

I could go on, with the $800 billion “Foreign Aid” personally ordered to be given to his friends, the HAMAS in “Palestine”, AKA, The Gaza Strip.

Why, General Quantock, do I keep referencing President Obama as a Usurper, or Felony Impersonator of The holder of the Office of The President of The United States of America, or the Impersonator of The Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces of The United States of America?

Simply because he is not Eligible to BE President, Candidate for President, or Commander-in-Chief of The Armed Forces of The United States of America.

Many Constitutional Conservatives believe that the case cited as the reason Mr. Obama gets a “pass” on being a “Natural Born” Citizen.

Wong Kim Ark was misconstrued by the sitting judge, and that you must look to Minor Vs. Happersett for the real answer. Quoted therefrom: WAITE, C.J., Opinion of the Court SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES 88 U.S. 162 Minor v. Happersett Argued: February 9, 1875 — Decided: March 29, 1875 The CHIEF JUSTICE delivered the opinion of the court. “The Constitution does not, in words, say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common-law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents* who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also.”

*Note: “parents” is the plural… meaning BOTH of them! This finding precludes Mr. Barack Hussein Obama from ever being a Natural Born Citizen, and, thus, INELIGIBLE to be President, Commander-in-Chief, or even Candidate for President. His father, though permitted in this country as a student, was never given citizenship, and, so, Barack, the nominal president of this country could Never be Natural Born.

So, how could such an ineligible person become a Candidate for President?

By those who “Vetted” him for the Democrat party, specifically, the Then Speaker of the House, Nancy Pelosi, and the then Majority Leader of the Senate, Harry Reid, ignoring Article 2, Section 1, Clause 5 of the Constitution for The Republic of The united States of America!

Even though you may ignore the argument about Natural Born Citizenship, General Quantock, there has never, to my knowledge, been a more Malignant President or Commander-in-Chief than the present, Barack Hussein Obama.

He must be tried for what the Progressive Media we have in this country call The “Scandals” I have mentioned above.

These “Scandals” go much further than just juicy tidbits of Yellow Journalism.

Some of them, at least, and others I have not mentioned here, in the interests of time and brevity, can be found to be called by their rightful names, Felony Treason, by an independent and non-partisan Court Martial!

General, let that Court Martial be made up of not more than 3 Company Grade Officers, for, one, Barack Hussein Obama, Impersonator, is only a low-life Chicago scum criminal impersonator, felony forger, felony user of forged or stolen draft card(s) to attain and retain Federal employment, felony user of forged or stolen Social Security Numbers, and the above mentioned crimes.

He is not of a rank which would require the use of Field Grade or General Grade Officers.

For proof of the stolen or forged numbers or cards, check with Maricopa County, AZ Sheriff Joe Arpaio, and/or his Cold Case Posse Lead Investigator, Mike Zullo.

This criminal, Obama is only a puppet of super-rich International Bankers like the Rothschilds, Timothy Geithner, Ben Bernanke, and other super-rich like George Soros, if he is still alive and living in this country, otherwise, his company or, “Charities”, or PACs.

But, General, I see him as the “First Pickle out of The Bottle”, so to speak.

After he is convicted, The International Bankers’ complicit organizations will fall like “Houses of cards”, there shall be many indictments of Members of Congress and the Supreme Court, who “Went along to get along”.

The whole Obama Administration and its peoples’ staffs shall fall.

All Obama appointments signed laws, and Executive Orders shall become Null and Void.

This Court Martial shall result in a Cleaning of the Washingtonian Air such as has never been seen before.
Not even, “Tricky Dickey” Nixon was this bad!

Please, Major General Quantock, let me know your decision or how you wish to proceed after reading this letter.

I know, that being Provost Marshal General since 2011, you must have been appointed by Mr. Obama yourself, but, sir, as a General Officer in the Army of The United States of America, I know you must be aware of having sworn (or affirmed) an oath to Protect this nation from ALL enemies, both foreign and DOMESTIC ! (Emphasis mine)

I, having served in the Third Armored Division in Germany during the Cold War, have a certain faith in my Chain of Command, sir.

I am positive you shall do your duty in this, as you see fit. I am sure the outcome shall be positive for Our Nation.

In God We Trust!

Sincerely, Bill Ascherfeld

Obama Reveals to Foreign Leader What He REALLY Thinks About the Bill of Rights

URGENT: Obama Reveals to Foreign Leader What He REALLY Thinks About the Bill of Rights


Everyone knows that President Barack H. Obama secretly disapproves of our nation, but few expected his disdain to be so strong that he would denigrate our esteemed Bill of Rights.
Yet Obama has done exactly that on numerous occasions. We learned as much from U.K. Prime Minister David Cameron, who revealed during an interview with Buzzfeed this week that Obama has often complained to him that “You don’t know how lucky you are to have a ban on political TV ads.”

The premise behind this grievance is that our constitutionally guaranteed right to speak negatively about our dear leader serves only to disadvantage the poor sap.
Obama basically resents the First Amendment of our Bill of Rights because criticism upsets his pitifully sensitive spirits — and heaven forbid that that anybody dare question his most immaculate wisdom.
This sort of egotism really ought not to shock anybody. Keep in mind that this man suffers from a case of narcissism so severe that he loses his mind every time negative approval ratings are released about him.
Furthermore, celebrated conservative columnist George Will once opined that Obama also suffers from a “pathological” and “clinical” inability to acknowledge the truth (H/T The Daily Caller).
People who resist the truth tend to dislike those who embrace it — like those of us, for instance, who have no qualms about criticizing Obama’s lackluster policies.
So keep complaining all you want, President Obama. Just remember that the Constitution is here to stay, whereas you and your presidency are nothing but dust in the wind!

Please share this post on Facebook if you believe that President Obama must never be allowed to usurp our right to speak the truth about his polices.

Saturday, March 21, 2015

MAYOR REFUSES TO REMOVE PORK FROM SCHOOL CANTEEN MENU..

Another challenge from another group of dissatisfied Muslim parents! Let's hear it for a Quebec mayor...
Or as the commercial promoting pork says
“put some pork on your fork”
WAY TO GO QUEBEC.......
MAYOR REFUSES TO REMOVE PORK FROM SCHOOL CANTEEN MENU... EXPLAINS WHY
Muslim parents demanded the abolition of pork in all the school canteens of a Montreal suburb.
The mayor of the Montreal suburb of Dorval, has refused, and the town clerk sent a note to all parents to explain why...
“Muslims must understand that they have to adapt to Canada and Quebec, its customs, its traditions, its way of life, because that's where they chose to immigrate.
“They must understand that they have to integrate and learn to live in Quebec.
“They must understand that it is for them to change their lifestyle, not the Canadians who so generously welcomed them.
“They must understand that Canadians are neither racist nor xenophobic, they accepted many immigrants before Muslims (whereas the reverse is not true, in that Muslim states do not accept non-Muslim immigrants).
“That no more than other nations, Canadians are not willing to give up their identity, their culture.
“And if Canada is a land of welcome, it's not the Mayor of Dorval who welcomes foreigners, but the Canadian-Quebecois people as a whole.
“Finally, they must understand that in Canada (Quebec) with its Judeo-Christian roots, Christmas trees, churches and religious festivals, religion must remain in the private domain.
The municipality of Dorval was right to refuse any concessions to Islam and Sharia.
“For Muslims who disagree with secularism and do not feel comfortable in Canada, there are 57 beautiful Muslim countries in the world, most of them under-populated and ready to receive them with open halal arms in accordance with Sharia.
“If you left your country for Canada, and not for other Muslim countries, it is because you have considered that life is better in Canada than elsewhere.
“Ask yourself the question, just once, “Why is it better here in Canada than where you come from?”
“A canteen with pork is part of the answer.”
If you feel the same forward it on, if not, hit the delete.
"Enough already! Simply go back from whence you came.

Pentagon loses track of $500 million in weapons, equipment given to Yemen

National Security

Pentagon loses track of $500 million in weapons, equipment given to Yemen

March 17
The Pentagon is unable to account for more than $500 million in U.S. military aid given to Yemen, amid fears that the weaponry, aircraft and equipment is at risk of being seized by Iranian-backed rebels or al-Qaeda, according to U.S. officials.
With Yemen in turmoil and its government splintering, the Defense Department has lost its ability to monitor the whereabouts of small arms, ammunition, night-vision goggles, patrol boats, vehicles and other supplies donated by the United States. The situation has grown worse since the United States closed its embassy in Sanaa, the capital, last month and withdrew many of its military advisers.
In recent weeks, members of Congress have held closed-door meetings with U.S. military officials to press for an accounting of the arms and equipment. Pentagon officials have said that they have little information to go on and that there is little they can do at this point to prevent the weapons and gear from falling into the wrong hands.
“We have to assume it’s completely compromised and gone,” said a legislative aide on Capitol Hill who spoke on the condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the matter.
U.S. military officials declined to comment for the record. A defense official, speaking on the condition of anonymity under ground rules set by the Pentagon, said there was no hard evidence that U.S. arms or equipment had been looted or confiscated. But the official acknowledged that the Pentagon had lost track of the items.
“Even in the best-case scenario in an unstable country, we never have 100 percent accountability,” the defense official said.
Yemen’s government was toppled in January by Shiite Houthi rebels who receive support from Iran and have strongly criticized U.S. drone strikes in Yemen. The Houthis have taken over many Yemeni military bases in the northern part of the country, including some in Sanaa that were home to U.S.-trained counterterrorism units. Other bases have been overrun by fighters from al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula.
As a result, the Defense Department has halted shipments to Yemen of about $125 million in military hardware that were scheduled for delivery this year, including unarmed ScanEagle drones, other types of aircraft and Jeeps. That equipment will be donated instead to other countries in the Middle East and Africa, the defense official said.
Although the loss of weapons and equipment already delivered to Yemen would be embarrassing, U.S. officials said it would be unlikely to alter the military balance of power there. Yemen is estimated to have the second-highest gun ownership rate in the world, ranking behind only the United States, and its bazaars are well stocked with heavy weaponry. Moreover, the U.S. government restricted its lethal aid to small firearms and ammunition, brushing aside Yemeni requests for fighter jets and tanks.
In Yemen and elsewhere, the Obama administration has pursued a strategy of training and equipping foreign militaries to quell insurgencies and defeat networks affiliated with al-Qaeda. That strategy has helped to avert the deployment of large numbers of U.S. forces, but it has also met with repeated challenges.
Washington spent $25 billion to re-create and arm Iraq’s security forces after the 2003 U.S.-led invasion, only to see the Iraqi army easily defeated last year by a ragtag collection of Islamic State fighters who took control of large parts of the country. Just last year, President Obama touted Yemen as a successful example of his approach to combating terrorism.
“The administration really wanted to stick with this narrative that Yemen was different from Iraq, that we were going to do it with fewer people, that we were going to do it on the cheap,” said Rep. Mac Thornberry (R-Tex.), chairman of the House Armed Services Committee. “They were trying to do with a minimalist approach because it needed to fit with this narrative . . . that we’re not going to have a repeat of Iraq.”
Washington has supplied more than $500 million in military aid to Yemen since 2007 under an array of Defense Department and State Department programs. The Pentagon and CIA have provided additional assistance through classified programs, making it difficult to know exactly how much Yemen has received in total.
U.S. government officials say al-Qaeda’s branch in Yemen poses a more direct threat to the U.S. homeland than any other terrorist group. To counter it, the Obama administration has relied on a combination of proxy forces and drone strikes launched from bases outside the country.
As part of that strategy, the U.S. military has concentrated on building an elite Yemeni special-operations force within the Republican Guard, training counterterrorism units in the Interior Ministry and upgrading Yemen’s rudimentary air force.
Making progress has been difficult. In 2011, the Obama administration suspended counterterrorism aid and withdrew its military advisers after then-President Ali Abdullah Saleh cracked down against Arab Spring demonstrators. The program resumed the next year when Saleh was replaced by his vice president, Abed Rabbo Mansour Hadi, in a deal brokered by Washington.
In a 2013 report, the U.S. Government Accountability Office found that the primary unclassified counterterrorism program in Yemen lacked oversight and that the Pentagon had been unable to assess whether it was doing any good.
Among other problems, GAO auditors found that Humvees donated to the Yemeni Interior Ministry sat idle or broken because the Defense Ministry refused to share spare parts. The two ministries also squabbled over the use of Huey II helicopters supplied by Washington, according to the report.
A senior U.S. military official who has served extensively in Yemen said that local forces embraced their training and were proficient at using U.S. firearms and gear but that their commanders, for political reasons, were reluctant to order raids against al-Qaeda.
“They could fight with it and were fairly competent, but we couldn’t get them engaged” in combat, the military official said, speaking on the condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to speak with a reporter.
All the U.S.-trained Yemeni units were commanded or overseen by close relatives of Saleh, the former president. Most were gradually removed or reassigned after Saleh was forced out in 2012. But U.S. officials acknowledged that some of the units have maintained their allegiance to Saleh and his family.
According to an investigative report released by a U.N. panel last month, the former president’s son, Ahmed Ali Saleh, looted an arsenal of weapons from the Republican Guard after he was dismissed as commander of the elite unit two years ago. The weapons were transferred to a private military base outside Sanaa that is controlled by the Saleh family, the U.N. panel found.
It is unclear whether items donated by the U.S. government were stolen, although Yemeni documents cited by the U.N. investigators alleged that the stash included thousands of M-16 rifles, which are manufactured in the United States.
The list of pilfered equipment also included dozens of Humvees, Ford vehicles and Glock pistols, all of which have been supplied in the past to Yemen by the U.S. government. Ahmed Saleh denied the looting allegations during an August 2014 meeting with the U.N. panel, according to the report.
Many U.S. and Yemeni officials have accused the Salehs of conspiring with the Houthis to bring down the government in Sanaa. At Washington’s urging, the United Nations imposed financial and travel sanctions in November against the former president, along with two Houthi leaders, as punishment for destabilizing Yemen.
Ali Abdullah Saleh has dismissed the accusations; last month, he told The Washington Post that he spends most of his time these days reading and recovering from wounds he suffered during a bombing attack on the presidential palace in 2011.
There are clear signals that Saleh and his family are angling for a formal return to power. On Friday, hundreds of people staged a rally in Sanaa to call for presidential elections and for Ahmed Saleh to run.
Although the U.S. Embassy in the capital closed last month, a handful of U.S. military advisers have remained in the southern part of the country at Yemeni bases controlled by commanders that are friendly to the United States.
Craig Whitlock covers the Pentagon and national security. He has reported for The Washington Post since 1998.

To the death cult of islam....




I would like to take this opportunity to allow the cult of Islam know, that Christian and Jewish brothers and sisters will kick your ass. We're just waiting on geared ass to do something.

~ William Robert Looman ~


A coming crackdown on Federal Reserve power?


A coming crackdown on Federal Reserve power?

Critics want to water down the power of the New York Fed president.

The Federal Reserve Bank of New York is pictured. | AP


A move to shift power away from the New York Federal Reserve Bank is finding some powerful friends in Congress amid lingering worries that a key part of the central bank is too cozy with Wall Street.
Two Republicans running the banking committees have both said they plan to explore proposals from the outspoken, former Dallas Federal Reserve Bank President Richard Fisher that would roll back a long-standing provision that gives the president of the New York Federal Reserve Bank an automatic position as vice chairman of a powerful committee and weaken New York’s oversight of Wall Street banks.
The politics may be ripe for chipping away at the power of the Federal Reserve, uniting liberals who want to crack down on Wall Street, Republicans who don’t like the Fed’s easy money policies and libertarians who are suspicious of the Fed altogether.

The move also reflects some regional rivalries within the Fed — the New York Federal Reserve Bank often overshadows other regional banks, and Fisher, known as a rabble rouser in Federal Reserve politics, has been lobbying for a change to the power structure.
Banking Chairman Richard Shelby (R-Ala.) and House Financial Services Jeb Hensarling (R-Texas) say they’re open to reducing the power of the New York Fed, and the move has the potential to appeal to Democrats who have been critical of the Fed, like Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass).
“Mr. Fisher’s proposal dealing with the Fed and the Federal Open Market Committee — we’re going to pursue all that and that would include the role of the New York Fed,” Shelby said last week.
And some Democrats have also said they’re open to policies that shift power away from the New York Fed.
“The New York Fed plays an extraordinary role, and maybe it’s extraordinarily captured, but it also represents only 6 percent of the population,” said Rep. Brad Sherman, (D-Calif.) who wants to give a permanent vote on monetary policy decisions to the San Francisco Fed, which serves nine western states and 20 percent of the population.
Sen. Mark Warner (D-Va.), a moderate who said he hasn’t taken a position on the proposals yet, said, “I do think there’s been some legitimate questions of the role of the New York Fed.”
Fisher, who retired Thursday after 10 years at the Dallas Fed, wants to yank the New York Fed’s permanent position as vice chair of the all-powerful Federal Open Market Committee, the panel charged with making monetary policy decisions, which met Wednesday.
While the New York Fed president could still participate in monetary policy discussions, he or she would no longer always get a vote. Fisher suggested the job should rotate among the regional Federal Reserve Banks every two years.

The move would upend the current structure, as the New York Fed has had a lock on that spot since 1936, thanks largely to its role as the infrastructure, which supplies the trading desk that carries out the Fed’s monetary policy decisions.
Fisher is also proposing that other regional Fed banks oversee some of the Wall Street giants in a move aimed at addressing criticism the New York Fed missed warning signs of the financial crisis, is too soft on Wall Street and holds too much power and influence at the Fed.
“The greatest concern appears to be the problem of regulatory capture by the largest and most powerful institutions,” Fisher said in a February speech in New York laying out his plan.
Wall Street critics have been suspicious of the New York Fed since it and its then leader, Timothy Geithner, played a key role in responding to the 2008 financial crisis and the bailouts that entailed.
Late last year its current president, William Dudley, was hauled before the Senate Banking Committee after reports from ProPublica and NPR’s This American Life that focused on a New York Fed examiner who said her warnings about certain business practices and deals at Goldman Sachs were ignored or brushed aside by her superiors. She provided recordings of her dealings with Fed officials to back up her case.
“We’ve got on tape higher-ups at the New York Fed calling off the regulators,” Warren told Dudley at the November hearing. “And I’m just asking the same kind of question — is there a cultural problem at the New York Fed? I think the evidence suggests that there is.”

The two most powerful lawmakers on financial policy say they are closely looking at Fisher’s proposal.
“I’m going to take a very serious look at that proposal,” said Hensarling. Hensarling said his panel will soon be working on another package of changes to reshape the Federal Reserve and “ensure we have a predictable rules-based monetary policy that works for working Americans. But anything that Richard Fisher proposes is going to get a very serious review from our committee.”
Similarly, Shelby told reporters last week he plans to pursue the proposal.
“This is 2015 and things have changed,” said Shelby, who is quietly working on a Senate legislative package. “We have a shift in population. Everything used to be in New York and a lot of it’s not.”
Part of the idea’s popularity may also be that it’s coming from Fisher, who is a strange political animal.
He ran for U.S. Senate as a conservative Democrat back in 1993 — which he now calls his “midlife crisis” moment, losing to former Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison (R-Texas). He worked in the Carter and Clinton Administrations and later worked for Henry Kissinger’s consulting firm, before joining the Dallas Fed. He also spent much of the 1990s running his own investment firm.
Some Republicans like Fisher, because he often bucked the majority on the Fed, opposing the continued expansion of economic stimulus measures, which he called “monetary Ritalin” for the markets. Fisher is considered a “hawk,” a monetary conservative who worries most about inflation, which jives with the thinking of Republicans and their policies.
“I have the highest regard for Richard Fisher, he’ll certainly be missed, his voice on monetary policy,” said Hensarling, who represents part of Dallas, although not Fisher.
Fisher is also known for being one of the louder voices calling for regulators to chop up the giant megabanks into smaller banks. And two years ago, he took an unprecedented step for a Fed president of attending the an annual gathering of conservatives, Conservative Political Action Conference, to make the case for breaking up Wall Street giants.
The big question now is whether his proposals can make it into legislative text.
While Shelby likes the idea, other senators on his committee, including Republican Bob Corker and Democrats Jack Reed and Heidi Heitkamp said they’re not ready to weigh in. For his part, Reed has a different bill to require the president of the New York Fed to be presidentially appointed and confirmed by Congress rather than selected by its board.
However, the ranking Democrat on the panel, Sen. Sherrod Brown, is cool to the proposal and said he doesn’t think Fisher’s proposal “changes much.” And Sen. Bob. Menendez (D-N.J.) said he has concerns about shifting power away from the New York Fed.
“I think the New York Fed plays an important role in the Fed system. And I don’t take lightly to some of the changes being discussed,” Menendez said. “Some of what I’ve seen is too far reaching.”

When POLITICO asked about the proposal in a press conference recently, Federal Reserve Chair Janet Yellen said she thinks the current system “works well,” and that there were good reasons for the current structure giving New York a permanent spot on the FOMC. But she added it was up to Congress.
The Dallas Federal Reserve said Fisher was unavailable to comment in his last week on the job, but a spokesman confirmed Fisher has been fielding questions from lawmakers on the hill on his proposal.
And Fisher is reportedly thrilled that there’s interest in this idea, said Camden Fine, president and CEO of the Independent Community Bankers of America, which is also pushing for Fisher’s proposal. Fine said he spoke with Fisher just last week about the idea, which “would balance the Federal Reserve,” and reflect that “economic centers are no longer concentrated on Manhattan island,” Fine said.
Fisher also assured Fine that his retirement from the Dallas Fed won’t dampen his enthusiastic voice for pushing his proposals. “He’s not going anywhere,” Fine said.

‘Islamic State Hacking Division’ Posts Kill List With Purported Addresses of U.S. Military Members

‘Islamic State Hacking Division’ Posts Kill List With Purported Addresses of U.S. Military Members

 

Calling for their beheadings, a self-proclaimed arm of the Islamic State published a list of addresses purportedly belonging to approximately 100 members of the U.S. military late Friday night.
Identifying themselves as the “Islamic State Hacking Division,” the group claimed to have obtained the personal information of military personnel from compromised military servers, databases and emails.

 Image source: Screen grab

“[W]e have decided to leak 100 addresses so that our brothers residing in America can deal with you,” the group warned.

“Kill them in their own lands, behead them in their own homes, stab them to death as they walk their streets thinking that they are safe,” the “Islamic State Hacking Division” added.


A picture included in the document which purports to leak personal information of approximately 100 members of the U.S. military. (Image source: Screen grab)
A picture included in the document which purports to leak personal information of approximately 100 members of the U.S. military. (Image source: Screen grab)


In the online document, names and photos accompanied addresses purporting to belong to the military personnel. An informal review of the information by TheBlaze appeared to show matches between some names, photos and listed addresses.

A Defense Department spokesperson was unable to authenticate the information, but said the U.S. military is investigating.

“[W]e are looking into it,” the spokesperson told TheBlaze in a short statement. “The safety of our service members is always a concern.”

In January, the social media accounts of the U.S. Central Command was compromised by Islamic State sympathizers. Hackers used Twitter to publish a list of military members and their addresses. At the time, the Pentagon contacted affected individuals and local law enforcement.



I will NEVER submit to islam! Warning GRAPHIC CONTENT!!!

I will NEVER submit to islam!

This IS islam!!

The following pictures are EXTREMELY graphic in nature. 

DO NOT ALLOW CHILDREN TO VIEW THEM!!!

This IS islam!


 I am sure my name is there somewhere!

















































Religion of peace my ASS!!! 

This is a DEATH CULT and nothing more!


I will NEVER bow to the islamic radical idiots! Allah FUBAR!!!

Do you need an extremely politically incorrect pork photo today??

I will NEVER bow to the islamic radical idiots!

I will always do my best to PISS THEM OFF!!!






































Machete-wielding man shot after attack on TSA agents at New Orleans airport

Machete-wielding man shot after attack on TSA agents at New Orleans airport

Published March 21, 2015

A man armed with a machete and insecticide attacked two Transportation Security Agency workers at a New Orleans airport late Friday before he was shot multiple times by an officer, police said.

Richard White, 62, approached the airport security checkpoint Friday evening, pulled out a can of the insecticide and began spraying both agents and several passengers standing in line before he then drew a large machete from the waistband of his pants, Jefferson Parish Sheriff Newell Normand said.

The male officer grabbed some luggage to defend himself from the machete, and then was chased by White, Normand said.

White then ran through the detector chasing a female TSA agent when Jefferson Parish Sheriff's Office Lt. Heather Slyve drew her weapon. As she approached White, he continued to swing his machete. Slyve fired three rounds, striking White in the face, chest and leg.

The gunfire struck a TSA agent in the arm, police said. Some bystanders suffered minor injuries as they scrambled to leave the area, police said.

White was still alive and in surgery at a hospital, Normand said.

Bystanders described minutes of panic and chaos at the airport in the New Orleans suburb of Kenner.
"Everyone was ducking for cover. It's New Orleans. I knew they (the gunshots) were coming from the security checkpoint area," said Garret Laborde, 31, a traveler trying to fly to Houston. "I immediately ducked down ... Then we waited."

He called the scene "instant chaos" with "screaming, lots of females screaming for a short period of time." Some bystanders ran to get out of the way and received minor cuts and bruises, the sheriff said.

Brett Leonard, whose flight from San Francisco landed in New Orleans shortly before the attack, told the Associated Press that passengers had no idea what happened until they walked outside after getting their bags. Leonard said he was packed into a cab with several strangers as police evacuated the area.

Passenger Jeremy Didier told Fox8Live.com that he saw someone "jump past the security guards waving a machete and cutting people." Another traveler, Cameron Matthews, reported hearing several shots and seeing people running before she hid until the incident was over.

Logan Tucker, 26, of Meridian, Mississippi, and Phillip Green, 33, of Houston, both deckhands on a tugboat headed to Houston for work, said they were about 25 yards from where the incident unfolded.
 
"I heard the gunshots," Tucker said.
 
"It was pandemonium after that," Green said. "I took cover. I didn't want to become part of the story."
 
Green said they saw the machete and the suspect on the ground as they were leaving. The knife was about 14 inches long, he said.

The male officer was taken to a local hospital, where he was being treated for non-life-threatening injuries, the TSA said. The entire airport was closed for about 20 minutes.

White is a taxi driver who recently received his chauffeur's license, authorities said. He has "little to no criminal history" aside from a few disturbing the peace and traffic charges, Normand added.

Normand said authorities do not believe White posed a national security threat, and were investigating whether he had any connections to the airport or anyone who was there Friday night.

FBI agents were at the airport and were assisting with the investigation, a bureau spokesman said.

Above and beyond: 2 states craft 'stolen valor' laws that exceed federal version

Above and beyond: 2 states craft 'stolen valor' laws that exceed federal version

Now Playing Stolen valor caught on camera

Lawmakers in two northeastern states are declaring war on phony veterans who claim combat experience in order to commit fraud.

So-called "stolen valor" laws are not new, and the current federal version was revised after a tougher one was struck down in 2012 by the U.S. Supreme Court. Laws proposed in New Jersey and Massachusetts would go further than Washington's regulation, heaping prison time on those convicted of faking service to the country to gain money or service benefits.

“There are certain areas you don’t go,” Massachusetts State Representative John Velis, a Democrat from Westfield who served tours in Afghanistan and Iraq. "Any person who has served will tell you that it’s reprehensible when someone fraudulently represents themselves as a veteran for some type of financial gain.”

Velis says his bill would make it a criminal offense to commit an act of stolen valor, carrying at least a year in prison and a $1,000 fine, making it the toughest law in the nation.
“People take that uniform and the American Flag very seriously. You don’t get to say you fought for it when you clearly haven’t.”- Massachusetts State Representative John Velis
“Just because there’s a federal law doesn’t mean that the state should nap on this,” he said. “The fact is that there have been no arrests under the federal law. Understandably, it’s not something at the forefront for the U.S. Attorney’s office. This [state] law will take it a step further to stop those seeking financial gain.”

In December 2006, President George W. Bush signed the Stolen Valor Act, which broadened the provisions of a previous federal law regarding the unauthorized wear, manufacture, or sale of any military medals or decoration and made it a federal misdemeanor to falsely represent oneself as receiving any decoration or medal. But that law was struck down in 2012 by the U.S. Supreme Court, which held that it violated the First Amendment.

“As repugnant as it is, if someone lies about serving for something like a pickup line in a bar, it’s legal under the first amendment,” Velis said. “My law is outside of that realm. The First Amendment does not give you the right to commit fraud.”

In 2013, President Obama signed an amended version of the federal law, making it a crime to falsely claim any military honor with the intent of obtaining money or any other tangible benefit.

Lawmakers on the the New Jersey Senate's Military and Veterans’ Affairs Committee are also seeking stiffer penalties against acts of stolen valor. They recently voted in favor of approving the “New Jersey Stolen Valor Act,” which would make impersonating a veteran or member of the military for obtaining money or other benefits a third-degree crime, in the same category as arson, robbery, drug possession and driving under the influence. A conviction could lead to as much as five years in prison.

Former U.S. Army Sgt. Anthony Anderson, who investigates incidents of stolen valor and maintains the website GuardianofValor.com, said lawmakers in New Jersey reached out to him when they were drafting the bill.

“It was brought to the table after they saw one of our videos,” Anderson said. “Hopefully it will help strengthen the federal law. The way it reads now it’s hard to determine how it should be enforced.”

Anderson is also hopeful that other states will follow New Jersey and Massachusetts’ example and craft stolen valor laws of their own.

“This makes the issue much more visible and state lawmakers will probably come forward with their own bills,” he said.

While their passage is still pending, the laws are bringing attention to a growing problem as veterans from Iraq and Afghanistan have been returning from service.

“People take that uniform and the American Flag very seriously,” Velis said. “You don’t get to say you fought for it when you clearly haven’t.”